Law Web4h
Supreme court: Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff Even If Suit Is Proceeding Ex-Parte Against Him & Written Statement Isn't Filed
without waiting till 30th May, 2002, on 3rd May 2002, without issuing notice to the defendants, the suit was taken up by the Trial Court, and an order of striking out the defendants' defence was ...
Law Web3h
Supreme Court: Courts Cannot Prepone Date Of Hearing Without Giving Notice To Other Party
When the defendants had appeared in the suit, the act of preponing the date without notice to them or their advocate was completely illegal and contrary to elementary principles of natural justice.
Law Web4h
'Highly Objectionable': Supreme Court Criticises Patna HC Remark That Widow Has No Use Of Make-up
State of M.P. , Labh Singh v. State of Punjab and Suratlal v. It is stated that the post-mortem report indicated that halfdigested food was found in the stomach of the deceased, whereas, Doman Tenti, ...
Law Web5h
Madras HC: It is not necessary to examine attesting witness to prove agreement of sale
If the revisions are allowed and the prayers are granted, the plaintiff will only prove that the signatures are of the attesting witnesses. As per Sections 68 to 71 of the Indian Evidence Act, the ...